Every year Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detains thousands of immigrants nationwide, including many lawful US residents, for reasons ranging from anonymous tips to criminal arrests. The immigrants are incarcerated in detention centers; as Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement (CIVIC) puts it, this practice “removes people from their families and communities, endangers their houses, jobs, public benefits and healthcare, and prevents them from adequately defending their right to remain in their home.“
Detained immigrants aren’t provided an attorney to navigate the legal system, and most can’t afford the $3,411 average bond to be released while waiting for a hearing. It’s not unusual for immigrants to wait years for a hearing while remaining behind bars, away from family and unable to work. In 2014, more than 50% of detainees in Northern California had lived in the United States for 10 years or more; 77% had families in the United States; and 65% had jobs before entering detention. Families are literally broken apart by the system. To address this injustice, CIVIC initiated the Bay Area Bond Fund, a revolving fund to ensure that immigrants can fight their deportation cases outside the confines of jail, in their communities, reunited with their family and friends.
Artists for Humanity, a local artist and cultural activist group, is holding a benefit to support the Bay Area Bond Fund on January 28, from 2:30-5:30 PM at Ashkenaz, 1317 San Pablo Ave, Berkeley. The concert features dancers Calpulli Huey Papalotl Cultural Group; musicians Dance Chant; jazz band Humanistic featuring Otoe Mori on saxophone, Greg German on drums, and Vince Khoe on keys; and powerful poetry by local artist and activist Pennie Opal Plant. Suggested donation $10-$30. See more information about the program here.
Sherry Drobner is an adult literacy advocate in the city of Richmond.
Business leaders called it a “moral abomination” and the wrong way to spur wage growth. Experts argued it was divisive policymaking that penalized blue states because they did not vote for Trump. Others noted secrecy and lack of hearings showed contempt for democracy and American norms of governance. Still Republicans rammed through Congress a tax bill that is so unpopular and corrupt some are calling it the worst piece of legislation in modern U.S. history.
What is there to learn from GOP tax bill’s passage?
The Tax Bill Revealed Republicans’ Values
Forget passing aid package to assist communities devastated by natural disasters in Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands; delay the simple act of reauthorizing the CHIP health insurance program that covers 9 million children; leave in limbo hundreds of thousands of Dreamers who need protection from deportation. Apparently, nothing is more important than raising taxes on millions of Americans and increasing the deficit by $1.4 trillion in order to fund tax cuts for corporations and the ultra-rich. Aside from a handful of individuals who evidence some trace of human decency, the modern Republican party has shown a demonstrable contempt for working people, democratic norms, and fiscal responsibility. What I find shocking is that Congressional Republicans value tax cuts for foreign investors over American families.
Congressional Republicans are Waging War on California
California is special. It is a global leader culturally and economically. The way California does things may irk conservatives, but in our federal structure, states have the leeway to experiment and pursue public policies that reflect the will of their residents. So it is profoundly divisive and un-American that the Republican party is using taxing policy to undermine California’s economic competitiveness. After all, the lower cap on the mortgage interest deduction will worsen housing affordability. Severely limiting ability to deduct state income and property taxes will make living in California more expensive, which means companies will have harder time retaining workers or attracting workers to move to the state.
Congressional Republicans singled out for the highest tax increases upper middle class households in California. They know that households that earn more than $200,000 a year (6.1% of tax filers) contribute the lion’s share of tax revenues (61% of all local tax receipts) to the state; increasing their tax burden will either get them to leave the state or pressure the state to limit spending, thereby hurting education and health programs.
California’s Republicans Have Betrayed Their State
It doesn’t matter whether you’re conservative or liberal, most Californians will lose from the tax bill. Congressional Republicans will argue that most of their constituents will get a modest tax cut in 2019. But after that, the reality of depressed home prices, repeal of deductibility of state income and property taxes, job losses from California’s diminished economic competitiveness start catching up, and the bill is an open wound to our economy. To paraphrase Ivanka Trump (who paraphrased Dante), there is a special place in hell for those who betray their people. All Californians must unite to vote the traitors out.
Don’t despair: There are some silver linings
Public outrage over earlier versions of the tax bill tempered some of its crueler parts: deductions and credits for grad students and adopting parents will remain, as will the ability to deduct student loan interest and high medical expenses. And some features of the bill, such as more generous child tax credits, increasing the standard deduction, and the lower margin tax rate, will benefit many Americans. Last, let’s not forget that no Democrat in either chamber of Congress voted for the bill. For a party of such diverse views, that’s huge.
The truth is I am bummed the bill passed. I know it will hurt a lot of Americans and exacerbate income inequality in our country. But recent wins in Virginia, Alabama, the energy and inspiring work of Indivisibles and so, so many other things make me realize: there is little that Congressional Republicans are doing that can’t be reversed if – when – we take back Congress.
Rohit Reddy is a marketing professional, who has a particular interest in bringing facts and evidence to inform decision-making. He resides in Alameda with his wife and two adorable little boys.
The conference room in Senator Dianne Feinstein’s San Francisco office was packed — standing room only. In attendance at our December 6 meeting were over 20 members of Indivisible: a combination of members of the East Bay and San Francisco chapters, plus one brave South Bay commuter. At the head of the table was Sean Elsbernd, the Senator’s State Director.
After brief introductions, we dove into a 90 minute conversation where Indivisible members took turns sharing our positions and asking Sean about the Senator’s plans. He was both communicative and frank in his replies.
Top of agenda were the two looming topics of the day: the tax reform bill and the impending showdown over the budget.
When asked what we as Indivisible members could do to help block the passage of the tax bill, Sean stressed that we shouldn’t focus our attention on Representatives outside our own districts because our actions would be unlikely to affect those votes (a point already well-understood by Indivisible).
At the same time, he indicated that the Republican House members from California should be a primary target for any statewide action. Being from California, a state that will be hit especially hard by the tax reform bill, these GOP Representatives could be susceptible to a change in their vote. They did, after all, vote to raise taxes on their own constituents. Sean admitted it’s a long shot — but it’s the best we can do.
As for the budget, Sean informed us that the Senator’s priorities are health care and disaster relief (especially for California fires and Puerto Rico). We stressed that we want Senator Feinstein to vote no on any funding deal that doesn’t include immediate re-authorization of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and to again vote no if the bill does not include a solution for DREAMers.
Sean responded cautiously, noting that while the Senator supports these priorities, they have to be balanced against the damage to constituents that a government shutdown would cause. Similarly, he added, the Senator believes it is not in our interest to sound as if we are in favor of shutting down the government, as this opens us up to potentially shouldering the blame should a shutdown occur. All agreed that this is a delicate balancing act, although Indivisible’s position tilted more strongly to proclaiming the intent to vote no if these issues were not addressed satisfactorily.
The rest of the meeting covered a diverse array of issues, ranging widely from Temporary Protected Status visas to gun control to net neutrality to health care to sexual assault to the Russia investigation to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) reauthorization. In general, as you might expect, Sean indicated that the Senator agreed with and was supportive of our requests and concerns, although how this would translate into action was often less clear. A few highlights:
On the matter of net neutrality and the FCC’s plans to dismantle it, Sean indicated that he did not think there was much that could be done on this matter legislatively.
When asked about reports on a major escalation in the privatization of intelligence work, separate from the CIA, Sean said Senator Feinstein will continue to oppose this.
Sean predicted that removal of the ACA’s individual mandate will remain in the tax bill, and said he thought there’s no stopping it at this point.
Regarding the Russia investigation, Senator Feinstein is sending out letters to various people requesting information regarding obstruction. However, her letters do not carry the force of a subpoena. On the plus side, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein’s tacit support for Mueller’s budget is a sign that Mueller will be protected from possible actions by Trump.
Overall, everyone agreed it was a productive and worthwhile discussion. IEB looks forward to our next meeting with Sean, which will likely be held separately from the ISF contingent.
Ted Landau is a retired professor of psychology. He has also spent several decades as a tech journalist/author — writing primarily about Apple products. He has been politically active in the East Bay since moving here in 2004.
The Endangered Species Act (ESA), passed in 1973, currently protects more than 1,600 species and has likely saved at least 2,223 others from extinction. It has allowed the designation of millions of acres of critical habitat, and it has very strong public support. Read the Center for Biological Diversity’s description of how successful the Act has been.
Five Republican-sponsored bills that would weaken the ESA have recently passed out of the House Committee on Natural Resources and are now before the House. They include:
H.R. 424, which would remove protections for gray wolf populations in Wyoming and the western Great Lakes states;
H.R. 717, which allows the Departments of Interior or Commerce to prioritize consideration of petitions to list species other than in the order in which the petitions are received, and does not allow prioritization of species to be listed over species to be delisted. It also gives each department the authority to preclude listing a species if there is the likelihood of significant, cumulative economic effects;
H.R. 1274, which says that Interior or Commerce must use data submitted by a state, tribal, or county government in making determinations of species listed, thus forcing regulators to accept any information even if it doesn’t meet scientific standards of peer review;
H.R. 2603(SAVES Act), which amends the ESA to disallow listing on nonnative species; and
H.R. 3131, the Endangered Species Litigation Reasonableness Act, which amends the ESA to replace the current standard for awarding court costs, including attorney fees, in citizen suits with the federal judicial code standard for awarding costs to a prevailing party – thus making it harder for citizens to challenge illegal government actions in court.
What you can do:
Please call your Representative to say that you support the Endangered Species Act and that you oppose these five bills that would weaken it.
Hello, my name is [__________] from [______]. I urge Representative ____ to oppose five dangerous bills that attack the Endangered Species Act, peer-reviewed science, endangered species, and the right of Americans to go to court to defend them: H.R. 424, H.R. 717, H.R. 1274, H.R. 2603, and H.R. 3131.
Among other things, these bills would strip protections for imperiled wolves in Wyoming and the upper Midwest and allow for wolf hunting in those states; cripple enforcement of illegal wildlife trafficking; stymie citizens’ ability to challenge illegal government actions in court; and allow regulators to accept any information that is presented by state, local or tribal governments as science—even if it doesn’t meet scientific standards of peer review.
The GOP tax bills will be catastrophic for California’s communities. While the tax scam is not law yet and there will be some changes from the House-Senate reconciliation process, we have enough information to know that it will raise taxes on millions of Californians, and that it lays the groundwork for dismantling Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, and greatly diminishes the ability of local and state governments to implement policies that benefit their residents.
For example, the plan eliminates deductions for state, local, and property taxes (“SALT”), resulting in a $1.3 trillion tax increase. The SALT deduction, which has been around since 1862, is valuable because it protects us from being taxed on money we’re already paying in (local) taxes. And the savings from this deduction are huge for us in the Bay Area:
Source: 2015 IRS Data (Individual Returns)
Congressional Republicans’ Betrayal of Their Own Constituents
Repealing SALT is thus a major tax hikeon a broad base of taxpayers. And it is not just a coastal Democratic thing; 54% of taxpayers in Republican congressional districts claimed the deduction.
Yet all but three members of the California Republican House delegation support the GOP tax plan:
Source: 2015 IRS Data (Individual Returns); Blue indicates voting against House tax bill
The GOP Plan Will Depress Local Economies and Home Values
The GOP tax plan will be a gut punch to our local economies. Here’s one way: Californians claimed $112 billion in SALT deductions in 2015. Let’s assume 2018 would be in the same ballpark if the deductions were allowed: that means that next tax year, with the deductions not allowed, the tax savings from $112 billion will get sucked out of our communities by the federal government and redistributed to millionaires, multinational corporations, and their American and foreign shareholders. Now ask yourself, who is more likely to spend their tax savings in the East Bay: the family earning $150,000 per year with two kids? or Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO? I respect and admire Mr. Cook, but I doubt we are going to see him at Ole’s Waffle Shop on Park Street in Alameda, or any of the Pegasus Bookstores, or the San Leandro Costco.
Eliminating SALT deductions also means the cost of owning your home goes up and home ownership becomes a lot less attractive, leading to a decline in home values that economists estimate to be in the 5-10% range. While many rightly bemoan the high cost of housing in the Bay Area, depressing the value of housing stock isn’t the answer for homeowners, who need to maintain the value of their most valuable asset and a vital source for retirement savings.
Cuts in services to the most vulnerable members of our community
We also want homeownership to remain vibrant because property taxes pay for schools and local needs. New homeowners mean new property assessments, which means more revenue to fund teacher salaries, transportation, and local services. For example: 57% of East Bay households are homeowners, but all East Bay families benefits from our schools. If the revenues from our tax base declines, what are we going to do: raise taxes or cut services?
Because the GOP plan will create a $1.5 trillion hole in the federal budget, we will likely see cuts in services due to a federal rule called PAYGO or “pay as you go.” The rules requires that if Congress is going to pay Paul, it had better rob Peter. The Peter in this case means Medicare (up to $25 billion in cuts per year) and other federal programs. PAYGO is only the beginning as Speaker Ryan has made explicit his intention to cut entitlement program due to … wait for it … deficit concerns.
It doesn’t take economic analysis, though, to realize this about the GOP tax plan: It demands neither shared sacrifices nor delivers shared benefits. It picks as winners those who least need help and losers those who need tax relief and our support. At a time when our nation faces formidable challenges, we need tax policy that advances our common national interest and provides for shared prosperity.
Rohit Reddy is a marketing professional who has a particular interest in bringing facts and evidence to inform decision-making. He resides in Alameda with his wife and two adorable little boys.
On December 4, 2017, IEB and other local Indivisible chapters held a rally in front of Senator Kamala Harris’ San Francisco office to protest the tax scam bills making their way through the Congress. Below are accounts from several IEB members who attended the rally, beginning with rally co-lead Nancy:
I walked up from Civic Center BART to the UN Plaza to be met by gorgeous rally weather – blue skies and gentle winds. A few wonderful team-mates from the rally organizing team were already there, with set-up well underway – and two frenzied weeks of planning were about to pay off.
A little before noon people were gathering, some singing tax carols and chanting. I’m an introvert, and was waiting to get nervous but I never did – I think I was too angry. Or more likely I was just too happy to look around and see this radiant gathering of the community – of people who know that this is what Democracy looks like. Honestly, most of the rally feels like a blur at this point. All I really remember is that it was a gorgeous show of solidarity, caring, and action. The beautiful crowd wanted EQUITY, and they wanted it NOW!
Most of us didn’t even know each other until we threw our hats in the ring together to plan this rally, but we were united in our rage at the unfairness, wrongheadedness, and bottomless bad faith of the tax heist. I am in awe of the willingness of everyone to say at every turn: “sure, yes, I’m on it.” No matter what else they had going on, they just got it done – and with brilliance and boundless good humor. I’m so grateful to the whole amazing team! Clear heads, valiant hearts, speaking truth to power: that’s who we are, dammit.
Meet the team (with a partial list of their duties):
Karen (Indivisible Sonoma County): Rally Co-Lead, Press List Wrangler, Tireless Promoter, Warrior Goddess and Cat Herder
Lisa (Indivisible Sausalito): Rally Co-Lead, Warrior Goddess and Mover-Alonger of Rally Activities
Ted (IEB): Steward of Rally Signs and Doer of Everything that Needs to be Done
Heather (IEB): Media Advisory Writer, Ruthless Editor, and Keeper of Captive Designer of Rally Signs
Robyn (Indivisible Sonoma County): Harris Team Liaison and Person Bonding with Rally Crowd
Shana (Indivisible Sonoma County): Keeper of Rally Central on Rally Day, and Cheerful Rememberer of Small Details Leaders Have Forgotten
Rohit (IEB): Writer of Harris Letter, Prolific Live Tweeter, and Knower of All Things Tax Bill/Healthcare-Related
Barbara (IEB): Storyteller and Person Making Sure All is Well with the Sound System
And special thanks to:
Amelia (IEB), who reached out to and coordinated with staff from Harris’ and Pelosi’s office
Christine (ISF) who edited our Media Advisory
Gen (Indivisible Sonoma County) who helped with the press list and sent out the Advisory and Press Release
Charlie Moehle (IEB) who documented the rally
Remarks to the crowd by George McRae:
Immediately after my 16th birthday I had to, by law, begin to have deductions made from my paycheck. There was the shock of a take-home amount much, much less than I had been used to. But I understood, and accepted that this was my responsibility as a citizen to contribute to the common good of the nation. Among the deductions were Social Security and Medicare, money I have since been faithfully paying into my account my entire working life. I always had the expectation that this money would be there for me when I needed it. Now at 64 years old I have no expectation, because the government is planning to steal this money to make up the budget shortfall with the tax scam. The Republicans admit to this and Senator Sanders got them to admit it the other day. Mitch McConnell himself said that the middle class would be screwed. I played by the rules, and now I’m about to get screwed. No one held a gun to my head and told me — you are now 64. You get to this age automatically. And I didn’t get here with the expectation that I would be screwed for just getting here. The only way to stop this is to flip the congress. I urge everyone to work tirelessly to do that. Here in California that means the primaries in March, only three months away! Unless we get these sons of bitches out, this will continue. Thank you.
When we come together, anything seems possible. Over 200 people attended the protest in front of Senator Harris’ office. Many courageously shared personal stories of how the GOP tax plan will hurt our communities. Representatives from Harris’ and Pelosi’s office listened and reiterated their resolve to do everything possible to stop the Trump tax heist. Special thanks to the indefatigable organizers at Indivisible chapters of East Bay, San Francisco, Sausalito, and Sonoma County, for bringing us together, and a shout-out to our partner indivisible San Francisco, who helped so much with promotion and who brought a big contingent to the rally. Check out Facebook to see how we are continuing the fight.
By Barbara Kluger:
I’m overwhelmed with the continuous daily political assaults and relieved whenever I can be with others who actually want to talk openly about it. Some people shared their personal stories on paper we made available on the info table; we will send these to Senator Harris. Others shared stories aloud by microphone to the crowd. Everyone attending was keen on meaningful human interaction: singing the satirical songs, chanting slogans, encouraging speakers with focused attention. It’s good to be together when so much of our time is spent keeping up with the latest news and interacting online. I had planned to tweet our activities during the rally, but never had time. I’m not sure my tweets would have made any impact on anyone, but I know that talking face-to-face with others was good for me.
For several weeks, a team of amazing Indivisibles from Indivisible East Bay, Sonoma County, and Sausalito planned the December 4th anti GOP tax rally in United Nations Plaza in San Francisco. The goal of this noon rally was to get Senator Kamala Haris’ staff and as many concerned citizens involved in this blatant “rob from the poor to give to the rich” GOP tax bill.
IEB’s Nancy kicked off the rally with an introduction of the terrible tax bill and its near certain bad effects. She and Karen of Indivisible Sonoma County led the large crowd in chants of “Kill the Bill” and similar messages. Many progressive groups showed up to show their support in creative ways: one group sang “Kill the Bill” Christmas carols! After ten people told the crowd how the tax bill would negatively affect them personally, Robyn from Indivisible Sonoma County gave a letter, drafted by all the Indivisible groups present, to Daniel Chen from Senator Harris’ office, urging Harris to stand strong against the GOP bill. Mr. Chen then addressed the large crowd and reiterated Senator Harris’ opposition to the bill and her efforts to fight it.
The Clean Power Plan (CPP) represents one of the strongest actions to combat global warming taken by the United States federal government. So likely you’re not surprised to hear that the Trump administration, playfellow of Big Oil, Gas, Coal, and Global Warming Deniers, wants to “suspend, revise or rescind” it. We have until January 16, 2018 to submit our comments and say “hell, no!”
What you need to know: The CPP works by reducing climate-changing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from existing coal- and gas-fired electric power plants. CO2 is the most widespread of the greenhouse gases fueling climate change. Existing coal and gas-fired power plants together emit more CO2 than any other category of emissions sources in the U.S.—roughly one-third of America’s emissions—so reducing those emissions goes a long way to reducing our total CO2 output. The CPP effectively reduces power plant CO2 emissions in 2030 by 32% from 2005 levels.
Under the CPP, the EPA assigned each state a goal to limit emissions from existing power plants, and gave the states broad latitude to meet those goals, such as switching from coal to natural gas or building new wind or solar farms—thus encouraging innovation.
Under the CPP, $20 billion in climate-related benefits alone would occur in 2030, as well as health benefits of $14 to $34 billion. The net benefits of the CPP, including the value of total health, environmental and other economic benefits, minus the cost to comply, were estimated to range from between $26 to $45 billion in 2030.
Trump’s EPA—headed by Scott Pruitt, who says “the war on coal is over”—is now reviewing the CPP with the intent to “suspend, revise or rescind.” The Trump administration challenges both the legal basis of the CPP and its economic analysis. (Of course, the administration is also full of people who deny climate change …)
What you need to do: Comment by January 16, 2018 to urge the EPA to keep the CPP. We need to move toward the future; instead of clinging to old, dirty technologies we need to move beyond them. The jobs are in clean power. We don’t want to cede the field on newer, cleaner power industries to other countries while we grow sicker and poorer. Please make your voice heard by submitting comments to EPA, and then by sending a copy of your comments to your Representative and Senators.
For over two decades, when a child faced criminal charges, Contra Costa and other California counties made the family pay for the child’s incarceration. This practice came to an end statewide this past October, when Governor Brown signed SB 190 into law.
Now, Contra Costa is considering restoring these fines and fees to families, which would make it the first county in California to do so. On a reportback to Contra Costa’s Public Protection Committee, the Probation Department identified $175,000 in fees (as opposed to fines) that were illegally collected from families between 2010 and 2017.
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to vote on the details of the proposed restitution at their December 12 meeting. The Contra Costa County Racial Justice Coalition and others call for the Board of Supervisors to return money to everyone from whom it was taken unlawfully.
Full restitution includes returning money with interest to those charged as far back as 1991 when fees were first imposed, returning fees charged for ankle monitors, and compensation for collateral damage (including impact on families’ credit ratings).
What you can do:
▪ Please call your Contra Costa County Supervisor (contact info) and say:
Hi. My name is ___, my zip code is ___, and I’m with Indivisible East Bay. I’m calling to urge you to make Contra Costa the first county in California to agree to return the fines and fees collected unlawfully from families of juveniles facing criminal charges. I ask that you vote to approve returning money to everyone from whom it was taken improperly.
Speak at the December 12 Board of Supervisors meeting during public comments
At present, the item is scheduled to appear on the Supervisors’ December 12 agenda. The agenda isn’t published yet, so please check to make sure that’s the date to show up.
Judith Tannenbaum is a writer and teacher. Her books include ‘Disguised as a Poem: My Years Teaching Poetry at San Quentin’.
OK, the pirate part was a tad bait-and-switchy, but it is hard to say “ARRT” without a pirate voice.
Anyway, mateys, the first meeting of ARRT/East Bay on November 19 was small but enthusiastic. We introduced ARRT – Artists Respond and Resist Together – and introduced ourselves, shared our art backgrounds, and identified some goals for the group, namely:
Events (such as the Oakland Women’s March; more on that shortly)
Shows (we have a potential Art of Resistance show space already),
a Skills Bank that Resistance groups could call on for logos, banners, art for booths, etc.
The first event where we plan to have a presence is the Oakland Women’s March on January 20, 2018. We envision showing up with signs, banners, masks, puppets … of course HATS … whatever we come up with to be part of what we hope will be an even more important demonstration of Resistance than the first, historic, Women’s March.
Last year was the outrage. This year is the heartstrong commitment. We will not be silenced, we will not back down, and, nevertheless, we persist!
Please join us for a Makers Meeting on January 7, 2018 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the El Cerrito Royale, 6510 Gladys Ave., El Cerrito. At this gathering, artists will brainstorm on creations and help one other figure out how to produce them. If you have sign and banner-making materials, please bring them. Most importantly, bring ideas (and friends!).
Special note to performing artists: we’ll also work on a brief street theatre scenario to be performed several times during the Women’s March. Performers, including those for a kazoo band, are needed and welcome!
RSVPs are not required, but it would be great if you could let us know you plan to attend (and a bit about your media). To RSVP or for more information, contact Heidi at email@example.com or Janis at firstname.lastname@example.org And please spread the word to your other artist pals … the more, the merrier, mateys!
The El Cerrito Royale is a short walk from the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station and is wheelchair accessible. Free parking.
Janis Hashe is a freelance writer/editor/teacher/theatre person. She has been politically active in Santa Cruz, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chattanooga and now Richmond. Her deepest personal commitments include fighting climate change, ending factory farming and overturning Citizens United. This is her second article for IEB.
Along with a standing room only crowd of over 200 people, CA-11 Team members Kristen, Ted, Colleen, and Elizabeth attended Representative Mark DeSaulnier’s 90-minute Town Hall at Miramonte High School in Orinda on November 20, 2017. Overflow attendees listened in the School’s library.
DeSaulnier highlighted many of the negative aspects of the House and Senate tax bills, and gave the sobering historical perspective that whereas in 1986 it it took 11 months to pass tax reform, the current GOP plan is to rush the bills through in two months. He also mentioned the mind-blowing amount that the bill will add to the national debt over 10 years: $1.5 trillion.
Pointing out that CA-11 is the twenty-third most impacted of all 435 congressional districts in terms of housing costs, DeSaulnier added that 45% of CA-11 residents use the local and state deductions that save them an average of $20,000 a year. If some version of the tax bill is passed, the deductions could be severely impacted or eliminated completely. In addition, DeSaulnier pointed out that 44% of CA-11 residents use student deductions, also on the GOP chopping block.
Of special interest to Indivisible members and other activists using the tactic of engaging our Members of Congress, DeSaulnier said he previously didn’t believe that making calls to Senators and Congresspeople worked — until he saw for himself that it does! He urged CA-11 residents and people in all congressional districts to call their Members of Congress, because it does make a difference.
As he does at each Town Hall, DeSaulnier reminded the crowd that as citizens we need to be engaged and to stay engaged. California District CA-11 is truly fortunate to have Mark DeSaulnier represent us in Congress.